Page 1 of 1

Mt Royal Diagram

Posted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 12:47 pm
by kd7jz
I really mean it this time.. :)

Re: Mt Royal Diagram

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2009 10:58 am
by W7GMC
Tim,
I've received a few comments on the .640 machine. It definetely is not hearing like it use to. Many whom were able to get into the machine are now unable to.

Is there any future plans of replacing the old machine?

Does the MT. Royal Repeater association need more support from the HAM community to drum up money to help permantely resolve the repeater issues?

73,
Ken, W7GMC

Re: Mt Royal Diagram

Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 3:05 pm
by kd7jz
It is not the repeater. I don't know if you read the previous postings but the issue is that Bresnan put in new dishes this summer that block the bottom half of the antenna from the southwest to the south east. Next spring we will put a new antenna up on the top of the mast.

Tim

Re: Mt Royal Diagram

Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 8:05 am
by KE7BIN
Tim from what you had said earlier putting the antenna up higher should do the trick. The ^3 has a great Foot Print when able to right.

Re: Mt Royal Diagram

Posted: Sun Mar 07, 2010 9:09 pm
by kd7jz
I don't quite understand.. I wonder if this was a typo?
"The ^3 has a great Foot Print when able to right."

73 Tim

Re: Mt Royal Diagram

Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 5:57 am
by KE7BIN
I'm sorry Tim Again What my mind wanted to say wasn't what my hands said. That should be the 64 has a great foot print